MAGAZETINI LEO IJUMAA

Carson: 'I do not see a political path forward' after Super Tuesday results

Speaking on Tuesday night, Ben Carson said he was not yet ready to quit the race. However, a statement released today has made his position less clear

Ben Carson has told supporters he “does not see a political path forward in light of last evening’s Super Tuesday primary results” and that he is dropping out of a presidential debate scheduled for Thursday in Detroit.

Carson’s future participation in the 2016 race for the White House was unclear. The retired neurosurgeon has not suspended his campaign. 

“I will discuss more about the future of this movement during my speech on Friday at CPAC,” Carson, 64, said in a statement, referring to the conservative political action conference convening at the weekend outside Washington DC.

“I remain deeply committed to my home nation, America,” Carson’s statement said. “This grassroots movement on behalf of ‘We the People’ will continue.”

Trump releases healthcare plan and Carson pulls out of debate – as it happened

Ben Carson reportedly will not participate in the next Republican debate in Detroit after a disappointing showing on Super Tuesday

Read more

Carson finished last or second-to-last in all 11 states to host Republican voting in Tuesday’s Super Tuesday contests. He had amassed only eight delegates out of hundreds to be awarded so far in the GOP nominating competition.

Despite his poor performance in the polls, Carson had projected determination to stay in the race as late as Tuesday night, when he sent a message to supporters saying that millions of them had convinced him to stay on.

“As long we continue to receive their support, and the Lord keeps opening doors, I will remain in this presidential race.”

The soft-spoken pediatric neurosurgeon had parlayed his inspiring biography and deep enmity for the Obama administration into a presidential campaign that at one point overtook Donald Trump’s lead in the polls.

Carson’s decision follows a disappointing finish in the Super Tuesday primaries, weeks after he finished last place in the South Carolina primary and the Nevada caucus. If he quits the race it will be a disappointing conclusion to a campaign that saw the retired surgeon reach the top position in national polls in November.

But when terror attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California, shifted voter focus to foreign policy and national security, Carson stumbled numerous times on issues relating to terrorism, Islamic State and international relations. The experience gap was highlighted after his top adviser conceded that the candidate was on a “learning curve” when it came to foreign policy.

Advertisement

Carson’s campaign never recovered, even among evangelicals in South Carolina.

The campaign also suffered from internal issues, with unusual personnel churn and an unusually high cash “burn rate.” The operation was criticized for channeling a majority of money raised from small donors – Carson raised $22.6m in the fourth quarter of 2015 – to the pockets of large marketing firms whose supposed work failed to make an impact in the polls.

Carson gained national prominence in 2013 when, as the keynote speaker at the National Prayer Breakfast, he savaged the president’s signature healthcare law only feet away from where the president was seated.

Citing his expertise as a world-renowned surgeon – Carson was the first person to successfully separate conjoined twins attached at the skull – the candidate told the Value Voters Summit that “Obamacare is really, I think, the worst thing to happen to the nation since slavery. And it is slavery, in a way.”

That would not be the final controversial remark of Carson’s tenure in the public eye. During a Meet the Press interview in September with Chuck Todd, who asked Carson whether he believed “Islam is consistent with the constitution”, Carson said: “No, I don’t, I do not. I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that.”

This statement and others like it often endeared him to a certain slice of the electorate, but according to voters in South Carolina, his sincere social conservatism and evangelical faith was not enough to mitigate his lack of authority on foreign policy.

“I wanted to vote for him, but my main issue with him was foreign policy,” Debbie Nogueira, a middle school Spanish teacher in Greenville, South Carolina, told the Guardian. While his stances on poverty and abortion were convincing, Nogueira said, “on national security, he just wasn’t the strongest”. Nogueira voted for Texas senator Ted Cruz.

UNCDF LAUNCHES REGIONAL CONSULTATIONS ON MUNICIPAL FINANCE

-First meeting in Dar es Salaam focuses on local finance challenges in African LDCs

In collaboration with the Financing for Development Office of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and the Government of Tanzania, UNCDF launched a global series of expert group consultations on municipal finance in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania on 29 February – 1 March 2016.

The meeting brought together a unique set of practitioners, local government representatives, academics, policy makers and the private sector from African countries, as well as UN entities and other development partners. In an interactive format, experts exchanged their experiences and suggested policy measures on how municipal governments especially in the Least Developed Countries can access long-term finance to implement the ambitious 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

“According to figures from the United Nations, 1.2 billion people live in over 650 secondary cities in developing countries. Yet most government finance and development aid is directed to central government agencies whilst private finance often avoids local governments”, said David Jackson, Director of Local Development Finance at UNCDF. The Africa expert consultation is the first in a series of regional consultations that aim to pave the way for increased and more effective international cooperation on subnational finance as called for Addis Abba Action Agenda and reaffirmed in the preparation of the Habitat III Conference later this year.

The discussion delved deep into lessons learned from fiscal, political and administrative decentralization experiences across African LDCs, many involving UNCDF support. There was a consensus view that enabling and empowering local authorities to unlock resources for long-term finances requires a holistic approach to municipal finance. Sound financial management and improved internal revenue generation including through effective property taxes, user fees, and land value capture can pave the way for better access to private and public domestic finance.

“Collaboration between banks and local government in Africa has to step up. Both actors have to meet in a middle area called trust where they share strategy, ambitions and solutions” said Ms. Zienzi Musamirapamwe, Head of Public Sector, Corporate and Investment at Barclays South Africa. Central government support and a conducive governance environment are equally important and intergovernmental fiscal transfers will remain a key source of local government finance.

Participants noted that many municipalities in Africa have come a long way in getting their finances in order while promoting affordable access to essential services for all. Experts discussed the positive experiences of an increasing number of African cities such as Dakar and Kampala City, both of which have received investment grade ratings from well-known regional rating agencies. The progress of secondary African cities has also been reviewed and noted.

According to Khady Dia Sarr, Program Director, Dakar Municipal Finance Program, development is primarily local; and finance is one of the keys to development. “We have to strengthen local authorities in Africa to tap into capital markets to respond to the needs of populations.”

“Decentralization is essential, especially fiscal decentralization” said Youssouf Séga Konaté, Technical Adviser, Ministry of Decentralization of Mali. Experts also agreed that successful decentralization hinges on a carefully sequenced series of policy measures. It is a process that requires continuous assessment of what works and what doesn’t and policies can change down the road. The discussion also featured lively exchanges between local authorities and central government representatives, including on the appropriate level and types of fiscal transfers and the authority for municipalities to borrow. Participants agreed that good communication and buy-in from all stakeholders are crucial factors for success.

Mr. Shomary Mukhandi, Director, Regional Administration and Local Government - President’s Office in Tanzania, gathered from the discussions that there is a need to consider other feasible ways of financing local government infrastructure development projects to meet and reduce the fiscal gap between actual needs and available resources. “We have learnt some valuable lessons from participating in this key meeting. Pertinent issues have been raised in improving municipal finance that can be applied by local governments in Tanzania to stimulate and improve local economic growth.”

The consultation will result in a publication that summarizes major findings and provide some general guidelines for policy makers at the international, national and local levels of the Least Developed Countries. In addition, the published results will feed into the discussions leading to the Habitat III conference later this year, which should focus on how to implement the global agenda through cities.